The panel of experts convened by the Department of Health and Social Care advise on the UK’s response to a pandemic based on infectious disease modelling and epidemiology. The document is likely to pose serious questions for the government about its policy and whether the UK is doing enough.
It said: "It was agreed that a policy of alternating between periods of more and less strict social distancing measures could plausibly be effective at keeping the number of critical care cases within capacity.
“These would need to be in place for at least most of a year. Under such as policy, at least half of the year would be spent under the stricter social distancing measures."
It added that the triggers to re-start measures after they were relaxed could be set at a national and regional level suggesting areas like London could face different restrictions to other parts of the country.
It said: “There would be a 2-3 week delay between measures being put into place and their impact being felt in [intensive care units].”
The document reflects advice to the government, not what ministers have decided they will do.
The statement said that scientists accepted isolating cases, households and social distancing of vulnerable people would not be enough to stop the NHS being overrun with critically ill patients.
They added: “It was agreed that it is unclear whether or not the addition of general social distancing measures to case isolation, household isolation and social distancing of vulnerable groups would curtail the epidemic.
“It was agreed that the addition of both general social distancing and school closures to case isolation, household isolation and social distancing of vulnerable groups would be likely to control the epidemic when kept in place for a long period. [It was] agreed that this strategy should be followed as soon as practical, at least in the first instance.”